Though tonight’s screening was my
first time seeing Invasion of the Body
Snatchers, I was familiar with the general story and idea behind it.
Despite never seeing/reading it before, the ideas behind the movie and book
have always been of interest to me because of how it is involved in discussions
of the 1950s and the move to the suburbs. I knew the film focused on a small
suburban town and how the pods threaten—or in other interpretations, critique—this
new suburban ideal of life. What struck me the most about the film though was
not the discourse it had with suburbia, but the ways in which one is truly “human”
and how it relates to emotions.
The movie seems to suggest that
emotions are what make one truly human, yet whenever people in the movie
actually show emotions, they aren’t taken seriously. In the scene where Miles
goes to visit Wilma and discuss her concerns for Uncle Ira, Wilma is the only
character really showing emotion; she is upset and expresses feelings of unease,
while everyone around her acts “cool”, or calm. When Miles later sees her, she no
longer shows those emotions.
Likewise, when Miles and Becky
respond to a call made by Jack and Teddy to investigate a body they’ve found in
the house, the people who show emotions are the ones who are taken less
seriously. Teddy seems to express the most concern and panic in this scene, while
Miles and Jack drink whiskey. It is especially noteworthy that the body is a
double of Jack’s own, but Jack appears more casually curious than he does
concerned.
Later in the movie when the town has
been taken over by pod people and Miles and Becky are the only two left to
duplicate, it seems to be emphasized that emotion is what differentiates real
humans from the new alien forms. More specifically, there is a focus on love. Miles and Becky insist that they
are in love and they don’t want to be replaced, but the kind of emotion they
seem to display toward each other aligns more closely with lust than love. This
questions the distinction between love and lust, an idea that was raised in
discussion.
It is also interesting to note that
the people showing the most emotion in the movie are women, like Wilma and
Teddy. Instead of their emotions being taken seriously, the women are written
off as needing to visit a “witch doctor”, while the cool, calm, collected men
take charge. This is at odds with the movie’s message that love and emotion is
what make people truly human. Yet the people who are showing the most emotion,
and should therefore be considered the most human, are the ones who are treated
almost sub-human at times.
Though the film didn’t relate to
suburbia as much as I had expected it to, the suburban setting of the town is
useful in considering the film’s messages on the importance of emotion. During
the post-WWII era when families were leaving the city in favor of the suburbs,
it was usually a move that favored the well-being of the man in the family. The
cool, calm men would leave their suburban homes to commute to the city for
work, while their emotional wives were left in the house to tend to the home.
With regards to the movie, one could interpret the suburbs as an environment that
brings out the worst aspect of people, whether it’s a nature of detachment and
nonchalance (exemplified by the men) or one of excess emotion and paranoia
(exemplified by the women).
Nice explanation of the emotional differences between men and women in the film. Another thing to note is the idea of asexual reproduction exemplified by the pods. I guess a (kind of sexist) view of the film could explain that the women are more emotionally stressed by the pods because of their implications of denying the women their motherhood. Since this movie came out in the fifties during the move to the suburbs, and women were encouraged to stay home and have children, the idea of asexual reproduction would strip women of their purpose in life: to raise children. The men don't show any emotion because they'll still be able to fulfill their roles as breadwinners when the pods take over. It is strange, though, that the people who show emotions are taken less seriously, and yet the point of the movie is to not let yourself be taken over by a "pod person," or else you won't have emotions anymore. How do you think this intersects with the idea of asexual reproduction? There must be some connection there. You make some great points here! See you in class.
ReplyDeleteCierra
Lindsey,
ReplyDeleteAwesome examination of the film. I, too, found the initial reaction to the double of Jack to be comically ridiculous. If I had found a body (even one that wasn't my own double!), I think I'd be a little more frantic than the way Jack portrayed that experience. His lack of emotion is interesting given light that emotion is what humanity really is in the film. Further, I really like your analysis of emotion and its relation to the sexism displayed in the film. I didn't even think about this when I watched it, but your points are spot on. The idea that emotion makes the human, but emotion is also disregarded in the society of the film is an interesting point to make. Nice post!