A
frequently recurring theme in “Shadow of a Doubt” is the photograph. Characters
both observe photographs and engage in discussions about photography. I believe
the film’s interest in photographs is part of its examination of the
relationship between characters’ personal and private lives. Both Uncle Charlie
and his sister attempt to control how and when they are photographed; they are
both attempting to control how their private lives are viewed (or not viewed)
by the public.
Through
the discussion of photography, the film draws differences between modern life
and life before the 20th century. The first photographs to appear in
the movie are of Uncle Charlie’s grandparents. When looking at these
photographs, one of the characters says something along the lines of “things
were simpler back then”. This observation draws a distinction between the
modern characters and their grandparents: the modern characters believe that
their lives are more complicated than those of previous generations.
The
grandparents’ photographs are representative of an earlier way of life (probably the mid to late 1800's) when photographs were seen by fewer people, and were
less revealing of their personal lives. Only a few
pictures would be taken of one person during a lifetime, and because you had to
sit still for photographs, most photographs (like those of their grandparents)
were posed rather than pictures of daily life. Additionally, pictures from that
time period were not usually seen on a large scale, but were instead mostly limited to the viewing of family and friends.
The
modern characters live in a world in which photography is much more prevalent.
More pictures can taken of individuals, and the photographs can be taken in
a greater variety of places. Therefore, photographs have to potential to be much more
revealing of their private lives than posed portraits. I believe it is for this
reason that the characters attempt to control how many pictures are taken of
them and where they are taken.
Throughout
the film, Uncle Charlie displays an aversion to being photographed. He claims
that there are no photographs of him, and he is obsessed with keeping it that
way. When the two investigators do take a picture of him, he forces them to
destroy it. Charlie clearly sees a record of his image as a serious threat. He does not say it
outright, but I believe that Charlie’s fear of being photographed is part of
his desire to keep his personal life completely secret from the public,
especially the police. (However Charlie does not destroy the picture of himself
as a child. This photograph is perhaps more like the picture of the
grandparents; because it is a picture of Charlie as a kid, his life was
presumably “simpler” and the picture wouldn’t reveal anything about his
personal life that Charlie wouldn’t want people to know.)
The discussion of photography is also present in the mother’s story line. In contrast to the time of their grandparents, the modern characters live in a world where pictures can be shared on a mass scale with other people and complete strangers. The film represents this phenomenon in the mother’s experience with the detectives; while the mother believes she is participating in a newspaper article document the “average” American family, the detectives are trying to gather information about Uncle Charlie. Although there isn’t really a newspaper article, the mother’s interaction with the two men she believes are reporters is revealing of her relationship with photography and media. When the reporters arrive at their home early, the mother is wary of allowing the reporters to see her and her home before she has arranged it look how she wants it to. She tells the men that she wishes they had called ahead of time because she had wanted to rearrange the living room. She wants to control what the public world can see about her private life; she wants to create a managed, public image of herself and her family. The mother's desire to represent her family as “average” by managing how their home is photographed to be shared publicly is related to Uncle Charlie’s desire to keep his private life of murder separate from his ordinary private life. Both characters understand the power of photography in shaping the public’s image of their private lives, and both want to have control over it.
The discussion of photography is also present in the mother’s story line. In contrast to the time of their grandparents, the modern characters live in a world where pictures can be shared on a mass scale with other people and complete strangers. The film represents this phenomenon in the mother’s experience with the detectives; while the mother believes she is participating in a newspaper article document the “average” American family, the detectives are trying to gather information about Uncle Charlie. Although there isn’t really a newspaper article, the mother’s interaction with the two men she believes are reporters is revealing of her relationship with photography and media. When the reporters arrive at their home early, the mother is wary of allowing the reporters to see her and her home before she has arranged it look how she wants it to. She tells the men that she wishes they had called ahead of time because she had wanted to rearrange the living room. She wants to control what the public world can see about her private life; she wants to create a managed, public image of herself and her family. The mother's desire to represent her family as “average” by managing how their home is photographed to be shared publicly is related to Uncle Charlie’s desire to keep his private life of murder separate from his ordinary private life. Both characters understand the power of photography in shaping the public’s image of their private lives, and both want to have control over it.
I find this analysis really interesting. I noticed the photos throughout the film, but hadn't considered them as being connected to the attempted distinction between public and private life. I also like that you made the connection between modernity (when photos can be widely circulated) and antiquity (when they were relatively rare and thus one could be far more private). I think you can definitely make the argument that the film articulates this tension and the cultural anxieties surrounding it.
ReplyDelete