For
anyone who has watched a decent number of zombie movies, “Dawn of the Dead”
covers some pretty familiar terrain. It follows a group of characters—a couple
and two police officers—who are forced to work together to survive the zombie
apocalypse. Once these characters get together, they need to find a place to
wait out the apocalypse, and to find supplies. Although on the surface this
film appears to be a pretty standard zombie movie— and while watching it, it
was fairly easy to predict what was going to happen—I think the film diverges
from the typical zombie formula in a couple of important ways. I think the
film’s tweaks in the normal zombie movie formula in order to critique its
materialistic protagonists.
The first major departure was the amount of
money and supplies the protagonists to work with. Usually in zombie films, the
characters are caught off guard and have to resort to using whatever they can
find to survive. In Walking Dead for
example, the protagonist has to resort to using a horse for transportation. In Night of the Living Dead, the
protagonists start in a car only to have it overrun by zombies. In this film,
the characters start the movie already having their own private helicopter, a
form of transportation which conveniently prevents any contact with zombies
(besides that one fuel stop, of course). It is abnormal for a zombie film to
give its characters such an easy way out of contact with their zombie antagonists,
and to remove the immediate tension of looking for a way to escape the zombies.
Despite
their advantage in transportation, the protagonists do eventually need to look
for supplies. In most zombie films, the process of attaining supplies involves
complications and danger. Often, the place with supplies is the hardest place to
get to, and is swarming with zombies. In Dawn
of the Dead, the characters land on the roof of a mall and almost
immediately stumble into a loaded supply room. Boxes of imperishable food
literally line the walls of this room, and the characters’ entry to it was unopposed.
This is almost an unbelievably lucky occurrence
in a zombie movie. Really, the movie could have ended here. The characters made
it to a safe place; they could have hidden out in their conveniently stocked
and isolated supply room until was safe to go outside again. But the characters
do not see it that way. Instead of staying in the supply room, the characters
decide that the superior supplies within the rest of the mall are too good to
pass up. Therefore, they deliberately put their lives in danger to get supplies
that they do not NEED but WANT. At this
point, it seems that survival is not the goal of the characters. But if
survival isn’t their goal, then what is it? It would seem that what they are
really after is comfort.
The
characters again show their concern with comfort when the group of bikers invades
the mall. Although the biker characters are presented unfavorably, I didn’t
think it was necessary for the protagonists to confront them. The way I saw it,
if they had hidden up by the roof the bikers would have looted the place and
left without bothering them. However, the characters (at least the character
Stephen) had become so possessive of the mall that they were willing to engage
in warfare to keep their abundance of supplies for themselves. Sure, the bikers
seemed like really unpleasant people—but it doesn’t reflect well on the
protagonists that they have enough supplies for way more than four people, and
that they are willing to kill other human beings to maintain ownership of way
more supplies than they could ever use.
Overall,
I think the film gave the characters these advantages in supplies to critique
them. They started with an advantage that most people don’t get in the zombie
apocalypse (a helicopter) and when they left, they immediately found a place
with virtually unlimited supplies (the mall). Even though they had more things
than they needed, they were unwilling to share. Ultimately, they found it
necessary to kill people to protect their monopoly on the mall. In the end it
was their greed, not the zombies that cause the deaths of two characters. The
first man dies after they have unnecessarily gone into the mall for fancier
supplies, and the second man dies after he decides that he can’t allow the
bikers to share in the mall’s ample resources.
Ellie,
ReplyDeleteI agree with your argument that this film changes the genre of horror and survival in Film. Before this film majority of the heroes that were seen were usually strong white male figures. However instead we not only see a pregnant woman, but a black man as well. Both of these characters survive compared to their fellow survivors who were strong white male figures. Maybe it's because Romero was trying to make a point on how being a minority living in a dystopian reality can rise above any oppressive force? This film was a game changer that makes audience members realize it doesn't matter what race, gender, economic background, or what ever in a zombie Apocalypse. All that matters is survival.
Ellie,
ReplyDeleteI agree with your argument that this film changes the genre of horror and survival in Film. Before this film majority of the heroes that were seen were usually strong white male figures. However instead we not only see a pregnant woman, but a black man as well. Both of these characters survive compared to their fellow survivors who were strong white male figures. Maybe it's because Romero was trying to make a point on how being a minority living in a dystopian reality can rise above any oppressive force? This film was a game changer that makes audience members realize it doesn't matter what race, gender, economic background, or what ever in a zombie Apocalypse. All that matters is survival.