The Unknown directed by Tod Browning is
a film that utilizes a number of techniques to cause an uneasiness but not an
outright fright within its viewers. This
film works to make the audience uncomfortable through visual oddities and other
games. The film centers around three
main characters Alonso (the ‘no armed’ man), Nanon (the Beauty), and Malbar
(the strongman). The film sets the eerie
stalker stage with Alonso’s quote, “No one will have her but me.” This is a fairly classic tagline for any
stalker since the dawn of time and continues to be an overused melodramatic
starting point for the blood mayhem and murder.
In creating this fraught line of dialogue the film starts its momentum.
A
huge recurring theme in this film is the idea of blood and gore, but not the
actual visual of these two ideas just simply the mention of or reference to
them. Malbar says to Alonso, “In my
heart in my soul in my blood,” referring to Nanon, causing a crazy look in the
eyes of Alonso creating a false foreshadowing that blood will perhaps be shed
at some point. This idea is continually referenced
throughout the film in scenes such as the surgical scene and the horse trick scene. Also the use of wine as a celebratory drink
could be hinting at the religious iconography of wine as Christ’s blood. Blood is almost always a factor in today’s
films, but this film evokes images of blood without, forgive me, spilling a
drop.
The
most unsettling aspect of this film is its consistent toying with the minds and
desires of the audience. It is
comparable to that toying we saw in Burlesque Suicide, where the focal point
plays out the scene as if he is going to kill himself and then points to the audience
as if to say, “ha, you wanted me to sicko.”
Which indeed we as viewers want to see plots that have been set up to
play them selves out. This voyeuristic
need as Berger puts it in his Ways of
Seeing is palpable with any film. We
want to see everything that happens even the most private of moments without
being seen ourselves. And we want to see
them to climax. When this climax is
consistently evaded it causes an uneasiness within the viewer, and uneasiness
is the base of Freud’s description of the ‘uncanny,’ that which gives us fear.
One
moment where this type of toying can be seen is the moment when Alonso is
killing Nanon’s father. We do not get a
full view of his death we only get glimpses as we mirror the sight of Nanon
when she tries but can’t quite keep her gaze off of the horrific scene. We aren’t allowed full visual privilege and
so we are unsatisfied.
Again
when Alonso goes to the surgeon to literally disarm himself we are given all of
the lead in that would suggest we will be seeing this gruesome operation take
place. But this allusion is shattered
when we cut out and only see him once the surgery has already taken place.
The
last moment, the biggest tease so far, is when Malbar has his arms attached to
the running horses and Alonso sabotages his trick by stopping the
treadmills. In this exceedingly drawn
out moment, the audience is almost waiting for his arms to be torn off. We can basically see the blood gushing
already. Even the audience in the film
continues to enjoy the spectacle, even when Malbar’s expression turns clearly
quite grim. Then we are thwarted again
in our attempt to see the plot through.
This constant tugging on the expectations of the viewer causes an
uneasiness for the other aspects of the film to build off of so an overall
sense of fear can be created.
Another
aspect to this film is the constant references to time without actually
explicitly stating the amount of time passing between each scene. This is one explanation for the continued reference
to clocks through visuals and the constant ticking noise throughout various
parts of the film. This is yet another
need the film is intentionally not fulfilling.
A need created by the film for the purpose of anticipation. Most of horror is the anticipation. The true thrill isn’t the blood axe murder or
the saw trap killing various people, it’s the lead in, the tease.
I think it's interesting that you focused on the audience wanting to see the gory little details of every film we watch. I completely agree with you. As a society, I think that we are constantly trying to get the "whole story." This is true in media, in personal conversations with our friends, and even with being inside other's people's heads. It's a sick obsession with living vicariously through other's experiences, no matter how gruesome and horrifying those experiences may be. Humans are curious in nature but I also think that we expect for everyone in our lives to tell us everything. We also become obsessed with terrible things like statistics on how many died during an accident or a shooting, we never seem to focus on the positives. I also think that humans enjoying being sad or upset. That saying, "Misery loves company," definitely human nature.
ReplyDeleteI was trying to identify where my sense of unease was coming from while watching this film, and I think you "hit the nail on the head," so to speak. I was waiting for bloodshed throughout, but it never happened where the viewer could see it. Browning must have understood these expectations, and in doing so, managed to subvert them in an unexpected and creative way. In the final scene, with Malabar's arms stretched between the two horses, I was so sure his arms were going to come off, and I found myself on the edge of my seat; it was almost a letdown when the expected finale didn't happen. It definitely played with my expectations as a viewer, which, as you say, stems from our need to see and know everything.
ReplyDelete