Despite all of it's
acclaim, before last week's class, I had never actually seen the 1931
Frankenstein. I
have; however, read the novel, recently
watched the 1910 version, seen
the comedies Abbot and Costello Meet Frankenstein (1949),
Young Frankenstein (1974),
and seen
the classic green monster in cameos over
a variety of mediums. Most of
these, other than the original novel of course, took
the 1931 release
as their primary inspiration
for their representation of Frankenstein
and his monster (In
fact, Young Frankenstein even
used the same laboratory set as the earlier film).
What I think this shows is
the staggering amount of cultural influence that the film has had
over the last 85 years since its release.
While
the film has exerted a considerable influence since it came out, it
is also interesting to examine how it may have been influenced by or
rejects the culture of its own time. This
is most present in how the film handles Frankenstein's
attitude towards his own impending marriage.
In the 1910 version of
Frankenstein, before
he is about to bring the monster to life, he
writes a letter to his soon-to-be wife that once his experiments are
finished, he will return home
to be married. This doctor
Frankenstein's acknowledgment
of his own marriage strictly
adheres to social conventions
of the early 20th
century where men are
concerned with getting
married and having a family, despite
the fact that they may also be creating artificial life on the side
of course. Opposite
of this, the 1931 Frankenstein shows an absolute neglect of his bride
while working on his experiments, almost
suggesting that he has no desire to be a part of conventional
society. An obvious reading
made by
Worland is to connect Frankenstein's
lack of desire to be married with the idea that he is a homosexual, which
is also hinted at when his father questions
why Henry
is so engrossed with his work
and humorously quips that perhaps
it is because Henry's
experiments are pretty enough to distract him from a loving woman
back home. Thus, it
almost seems that Frankenstein is having a gay love affair with a
creature of his own creation. There
is also the disturbing fact
that at first Frankenstein has a near (abusive) fatherly relationship
with his
creature which takes this
relationship one step further and makes it an
incestuous
affair with his own child. That's
approaching a rather high amount of sexual deviancy which
would be heavily frowned
upon by most cultures and
shows how Dr. Frankenstein is nearly completely ignorant of societal
norms. At the end of the
film; however, he is seemingly redeemed and reformed, but could it be
possible that he is only
repressing his true desires due to the expectations put on him by
society?
Frankenstein
also defies social convention in
religious terms as well. The
opening scene has Frankenstein and Fritz exhuming a corpse from a
grave surrounded not only by crosses, but an onlooking crucifix.
By digging up the grave, they
are also breaking an obvious taboo of religious burial customs.
During the creation scene,
one of the most iconic lines is when Frankenstein says “Now I know
what it feels like to be God!”
By creating life and playing
the role of God, Frankenstein
is effectively breaking the first Christian commandment which states
“You shall have no other gods before me”. He
has become his own god and
completely disregarded his
society's main religion.
When the film was first
released, this line was actually edited out due to controversy,
showing how Frankenstein's
blasphemy even extends to
offending the real world. More
or less like before, at the end of the film, Frankenstein is forgiven
and seemingly re-adapted
to the normal world.
This is an interesting analysis of the original source of monstrosity in this film: Henry Frankenstein. His enraged focus on stitching together and producing life in a man from different pieces of death rather than through the more traditional, marital reproduction method with Elizabeth is a highly peculiar decision on his part. Arguably, natural birth is even more "something from nothing" than Frankenstein's method, as he's using pieces of people that at one point already had life. Is his focus on creation sourced in his own sexual reluctance, is it simple scientific exploration, or is it something monstrous in him? Your note that he seems more redeemed in the face of society is a good one, and it does seem likely that it's sourced in his motivation to destroy the monster along with the rest of the town. This draws the question of how Henry may have reacted differently had the monster's birth into the world been less fraught with fear and death. Would he have turned away from Elizabeth entirely? Nice post!
ReplyDeleteThe point that you bring up about how everything goes back to "normal" by the end of the movie is a good point that reflects the attitudes of the time the film was made. The film can, to a degree, be seen as one big metaphor for the struggle over sexual identity. Then, on top of that, the person going through the struggle declares himself a god. Both of those aspects are extremely daring to present to a 1930's audience. I think if the film hadn't had a "normal" ending half the audience would have had a heart attack.
ReplyDeleteBecause of all these examples of taboo you mention here, Kevin, this film would probably not have made it past the censors of the 1934 Production Code Administration (a more inflexible enforcement of banned content first proposed in 1930). As Worland notes, Whale's creation had a tough enough time with moral squeamishness just three years earlier, but the '34 PCA police would have panned it outright or, at the very least, ripped it apart to its pre-monster state.
ReplyDeleteThanks!
MH
I thought it was really interesting how you connected Frankenstein's creation of artificial life to the breaking of one of the ten commandments. That comparison takes the blasphemy in Frankenstein to a new level, and puts an interesting spin on the idea of religion in the film.
ReplyDeleteI thought it was really interesting how you connected Frankenstein's creation of artificial life to the breaking of one of the ten commandments. That comparison takes the blasphemy in Frankenstein to a new level, and puts an interesting spin on the idea of religion in the film.
ReplyDeleteI like how you dissected the interesting homoerotic influences present in this film. I definitely agree that Frankenstein has little interest in his wife and I think that the fervor in which he tries to create life has a sexual aspect to it. To me, it seems like his fantasies surround creating life, but once the monster is actually alive, Frankenstein's attraction for him seems to diminish.
ReplyDelete