Monday, February 15, 2016

Societal Taboos and How Frankenstein Breaks Them

Despite all of it's acclaim, before last week's class, I had never actually seen the 1931 Frankenstein. I have; however, read the novel, recently watched the 1910 version, seen the comedies Abbot and Costello Meet Frankenstein (1949), Young Frankenstein (1974), and seen the classic green monster in cameos over a variety of mediums. Most of these, other than the original novel of course, took the 1931 release as their primary inspiration for their representation of Frankenstein and his monster (In fact, Young Frankenstein even used the same laboratory set as the earlier film). What I think this shows is the staggering amount of cultural influence that the film has had over the last 85 years since its release.
While the film has exerted a considerable influence since it came out, it is also interesting to examine how it may have been influenced by or rejects the culture of its own time. This is most present in how the film handles Frankenstein's attitude towards his own impending marriage. In the 1910 version of Frankenstein, before he is about to bring the monster to life, he writes a letter to his soon-to-be wife that once his experiments are finished, he will return home to be married. This doctor Frankenstein's acknowledgment of his own marriage strictly adheres to social conventions of the early 20th century where men are concerned with getting married and having a family, despite the fact that they may also be creating artificial life on the side of course. Opposite of this, the 1931 Frankenstein shows an absolute neglect of his bride while working on his experiments, almost suggesting that he has no desire to be a part of conventional society. An obvious reading made by Worland is to connect Frankenstein's lack of desire to be married with the idea that he is a homosexual, which is also hinted at when his father questions why Henry is so engrossed with his work and humorously quips that perhaps it is because Henry's experiments are pretty enough to distract him from a loving woman back home. Thus, it almost seems that Frankenstein is having a gay love affair with a creature of his own creation. There is also the disturbing fact that at first Frankenstein has a near (abusive) fatherly relationship with his creature which takes this relationship one step further and makes it an incestuous affair with his own child. That's approaching a rather high amount of sexual deviancy which would be heavily frowned upon by most cultures and shows how Dr. Frankenstein is nearly completely ignorant of societal norms. At the end of the film; however, he is seemingly redeemed and reformed, but could it be possible that he is only repressing his true desires due to the expectations put on him by society?
Frankenstein also defies social convention in religious terms as well. The opening scene has Frankenstein and Fritz exhuming a corpse from a grave surrounded not only by crosses, but an onlooking crucifix. By digging up the grave, they are also breaking an obvious taboo of religious burial customs. During the creation scene, one of the most iconic lines is when Frankenstein says “Now I know what it feels like to be God!” By creating life and playing the role of God, Frankenstein is effectively breaking the first Christian commandment which states “You shall have no other gods before me”. He has become his own god and completely disregarded his society's main religion. When the film was first released, this line was actually edited out due to controversy, showing how Frankenstein's blasphemy even extends to offending the real world. More or less like before, at the end of the film, Frankenstein is forgiven and seemingly re-adapted to the normal world.

6 comments:

  1. This is an interesting analysis of the original source of monstrosity in this film: Henry Frankenstein. His enraged focus on stitching together and producing life in a man from different pieces of death rather than through the more traditional, marital reproduction method with Elizabeth is a highly peculiar decision on his part. Arguably, natural birth is even more "something from nothing" than Frankenstein's method, as he's using pieces of people that at one point already had life. Is his focus on creation sourced in his own sexual reluctance, is it simple scientific exploration, or is it something monstrous in him? Your note that he seems more redeemed in the face of society is a good one, and it does seem likely that it's sourced in his motivation to destroy the monster along with the rest of the town. This draws the question of how Henry may have reacted differently had the monster's birth into the world been less fraught with fear and death. Would he have turned away from Elizabeth entirely? Nice post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The point that you bring up about how everything goes back to "normal" by the end of the movie is a good point that reflects the attitudes of the time the film was made. The film can, to a degree, be seen as one big metaphor for the struggle over sexual identity. Then, on top of that, the person going through the struggle declares himself a god. Both of those aspects are extremely daring to present to a 1930's audience. I think if the film hadn't had a "normal" ending half the audience would have had a heart attack.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Because of all these examples of taboo you mention here, Kevin, this film would probably not have made it past the censors of the 1934 Production Code Administration (a more inflexible enforcement of banned content first proposed in 1930). As Worland notes, Whale's creation had a tough enough time with moral squeamishness just three years earlier, but the '34 PCA police would have panned it outright or, at the very least, ripped it apart to its pre-monster state.

    Thanks!
    MH

    ReplyDelete
  4. I thought it was really interesting how you connected Frankenstein's creation of artificial life to the breaking of one of the ten commandments. That comparison takes the blasphemy in Frankenstein to a new level, and puts an interesting spin on the idea of religion in the film.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I thought it was really interesting how you connected Frankenstein's creation of artificial life to the breaking of one of the ten commandments. That comparison takes the blasphemy in Frankenstein to a new level, and puts an interesting spin on the idea of religion in the film.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like how you dissected the interesting homoerotic influences present in this film. I definitely agree that Frankenstein has little interest in his wife and I think that the fervor in which he tries to create life has a sexual aspect to it. To me, it seems like his fantasies surround creating life, but once the monster is actually alive, Frankenstein's attraction for him seems to diminish.

    ReplyDelete