In a present day world where people
are encouraged more and more everyday to freely express themselves, it’s
difficult to imagine the constraints directors, writers, and producers faced
when met with the Motion Picture Production Code in the 1930’s. Surrounding several issues that involved
their decency, the “Hays” Code, as it was referred to, implemented strict
regulations on matters including sex, violence, and questions of morality. In his movie Cat People (a title that offers some restrictions in itself), Val
Lewton uses clever discrepancies to the Production Code to incorporate feelings
of sympathy that relate to the character Irena’s plight in being “othered” and
to give recognition to the presence of Freud and the uncanny in readings of the
film.
The
placement of the uncanny on the female spectacle in Cat People is emphasized by the psychoanalytic reading of the film
and articulated by Freud, “Many people experience the feeling of the uncanny in
relation to death and dead bodies, to the return of the dead and spirits and
ghosts”. The ghost is a powerful figure
of the primal uncanny, as it associates women with the fleeting, making them
appear unstable and therefore undesirable.
Irene is the epitome of this reading, as she is immediately “othered” in
the film and put in direct contrast to the additional characters by her accent
and belief in superstitions. She is a
complex, tortured woman and therefore distant.
Oliver, on the other hand, is the complete opposite. He is the typical happy, optimistic
Americano, while she is a dread-fearing immigrant.
The stark contrast
between Irene and the other characters is also illustrated by the mise en scène in her apartment. The lighting is low key and a nod to European
expressionism. The décor lays out Irena’s
belief in the myth and comments on the part of the narrative that consists of
her becoming an animal. This notion is
also important in regards to how “becoming” is a feared process. We see this in Irena, as she fears becoming a
cat, which is her character’s inability to comprehend or confront
“becoming”. She fears what it entails;
not only a cat, but also being a true “Mrs.” and being Americanized, as
well.
To be a true “Mrs.
Reed”, Irena would have to experience sexuality with a man, but her beliefs in
the superstitions and myths prevent her from doing so for fear of becoming a
cat. It also coincides with the Hays
Code to have her sexuality be stifled and communicated in less-obvious ways,
for instance in the presentation of the uncanny in the film. Irena’s plight can be summed up in a quote
from Donna Heiland, “An innocent woman trapped by one man and freed by
another”. Irena is trapped by her fear
of the King John myth and tortured by her father’s absence, and wishes to be
freed by Oliver. However, she is
sexually repressed, as is the film. The
uncanny is shown through certain instances such as the notion of keys and
keyholes in the film, as well as Irena’s slow transformation into a cat. Her movements start becoming more
feline-like, slinky and slow, and her inner cat stars purring.
Val Lewton played
on the lines of the Production Code by disguising hints of sexuality such as
this in the film. He expertly places
Irena as the “other” and illuminates sexuality in the film through metaphors
pertaining to the character’s stories.
Another aspect of the code Lewton plays with in the end is not allowing
sympathy to be “thrown at evil”. While
Irena may have been viewed as the villain in the movie, it’s hard not to feel
pangs of sympathy for her as she is discovered dead by Oliver and Alice, and
her widowed husband comments on how, “She never lied to us”. It’s in this moment of self-realization that
Oliver understands how Irena’s problems weren’t to be so easily dismissed as
they had been, and that by doing so, Oliver only drove Irena away. Val Lewton expertly incorporates these discrepancies
and invites the viewer to ponder the film, urging them to discover the
ever-so-obvious presence of Freud, the uncanny, and Irena’s struggle.
I love your inclusion of Donna Heiland's quote. That thought didn't even cross my mind during my initial viewing, but I definitely agree with you. Rather than making broad generalizations while dissecting the film, you dug deeper. This may be slightly off topic, but I appreciate the gifs you sprinkled throughout your post. It keeps things spicy!
ReplyDelete